September 19th, 2013
08:50 PM ET

Same company vetted Navy Yard shooter and NSA leaker Edward Snowden

CNN has learned the same company that conducted the background check for Navy Yard gunman Aaron Alexis also vetted NSA leaker Edward Snowden.

USIS, a private government contractor currently under investigation, vetted Alexis in 2007 and Snowden in 2011.

Alexis' background, including his history of troubled mental health, has been a focal point for investigators who are questioning how he obtained a security clearance.

Pentagon correspondent Chris Lawrence is OutFront.

Filed under: Military • Navy Yard Shooting
soundoff (2 Responses)
  1. Crowd It Forward

    Our online charity crowdfunding site Crowd It Forward has also set up a fund for the victims and families. http://bit.ly/18fz4ii Easy online tax-deductible donations to a great 501(c)(3) foundation that does Random Acts of Crowdfunding. http://www.CrowdItForward.com.

    Be careful who you donate to. Unlike many charities, Crowd It Forward pledges that at least 90% of every dollar donated will go the the victims and families, and will publicly display our finances to prove it. Many charities, including some major ones, give as little as 10-20% of the money donated to the actual victims.

    To donate, or pass this along, use this link: http://bit.ly/18fz4ii Thank you.

    September 20, 2013 at 10:51 am | Reply
  2. Mark S. Zaid, Esq.

    On tonight's Erin Burnett program she raised concerns that USIS, a contractor for OPM, had conducted both the background investigations on Edward Snowden and Aaron Alexis, as if somehow that was a shocking find. I really admire Erin and I enjoy going on her program, but this is a complete non-issue.

    I don't even really like USIS. We call them "Useless" in the industry. Their background investigative reports are often full of grammatical, spelling and factual errors, but the fact is that – at least based on all the information known so far – nothing in either man's background that was revealed at the time of their investigations would have predicted they would ever do what they did. It is completely unfair to taint USIS, which has more than enough legitimate problems, with any responsibility in these cases.

    Plus, USIS has nothing to do with the decision to grant the security clearance. Those decisions were made by USGOVT officials.

    September 19, 2013 at 11:25 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.