January 31st, 2014
08:31 PM ET

Ex-Official: Chris Christie knew about bridge lane closures

The New York Times says there's "evidence" New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, a likely 2016 Republican presidential candidate knew about the lane closures on the George Washington bridge - the scandal threatening his political career.

The big question is: Where is the proof?

The headline the New York Times first posted Friday read: "Christie Knew About Lane Closings, Ex-Port Authority Official Says"

That headline implies, he knew about them before they happened. Now, they've toned that down to:

"Ex-Port Authority Official Says 'Evidence Exists' Christie Knew About Lane Closings".

The implication relies on the two and a half page letter from Steve Wildstein's attorney. Wildstein is the man at the center of Bridgegate.

The now former Port Authority official, David Wildstein authorized the lane closures allegedly to punish a local mayor for not endorsing Christie in the governor's race. The Times cites a letter written by Wildstein's attorney describing the move to shut down the lanes.

Here is the key part of the letter:

"It has also come to light that a person within the Christie administration communicated the Christie administration's order that certain lanes on the George Washington Bridge were to be closed, and evidence exists as well tying Mr. Christie to having knowledge of the lane closures, during the period when the lanes were closed, contrary to what the Governor stated publicly in a two-hour press conference he gave immediately before Mr. Wildstein was scheduled to appear before the Transportation Committee."

The Christie administration initially said the lane closures were part of a traffic study, which has since been called into question by e-mails suggesting key advisers carried them out.

Lawyer for scandal figure: 'Evidence' disputes Christie on bridge lane closures

"I knew nothing about this," Christie said at the press conference. "And until it started to be reported in the papers about the closure, but even then I was told this was a traffic study. I had no knowledge or involvement in this issue, in its planning, or its execution or anything about it."

There are two big questions.

Did the governor know about the lane closures before they happened? And did he order their closing?

A source in the governor's office tells CNN's Erin Burnett that Christie stands behind what he said at that press conference. The source says categorically that while the governor has not been specific about the exact date he learned about the lane closures, he heard about them through press reports.

The source says Christie stands by his earlier remarks that he did not direct Wildstein to close the lanes and he knew nothing about the closures prior to the event.

So is this latest development damaging to Christie?

OutFront: Political analyst Steve Adubato and CNN political analyst Paul Begala.

Filed under: Bridge Scandal • Chris Christie • News • Politics
soundoff (3 Responses)
  1. Lou from AZ

    Gov. Christie better get used to answering questions about the bridge fiasco. . . people still wonder if Obama's birth certificate is real.

    February 3, 2014 at 7:56 pm | Reply
  2. Maria Mueller

    At least Christie fired the aide responsible and promises to cooperate with any investigation to determine the actual facts.
    Hillary Clinton, in the Bengazi attack, repeatedly stated the attack was due to an Internet video, when she new that night that this was not the case, told Congress "what does it matter, did not fire any staff members and still has not stated that she will assist in any investigation... Seem to me CNN's Christie comments are a bit one sided....
    Maybe we should as Werner used to say,"check the video tape" to determine if her denial of the attack had anything to do with the upcoming Presidential debate that week...

    February 3, 2014 at 7:32 pm | Reply
  3. Shawn

    You guys cover this with such zeal. Where were you with your judgements after Bengazi?

    February 3, 2014 at 7:05 pm | Reply

Post a comment


CNN welcomes a lively and courteous discussion as long as you follow the Rules of Conduct set forth in our Terms of Service. Comments are not pre-screened before they post. You agree that anything you post may be used, along with your name and profile picture, in accordance with our Privacy Policy and the license you have granted pursuant to our Terms of Service.