(CNN) - Los Angeles Clippers co-owner Donald Sterling made clear he wasn't going away Friday, suing the NBA for more than $1 billion for its decision to ban him for life and force him to sell the franchise.
The lawsuit - which was provided to CNN by Sterling's lawyer and wasn't unexpected - marks the latest twist in a case that began last month when TMZ posted a recording in which Sterling made a racist comments. It also comes amid fresh questions about the 80-year-old's mental state, which itself raises the issue of how much control he has or should have with the Clipppers.
Among other allegations, Sterling's camp claims in its lawsuit that the recording that spawned this scandal - and that recording, it says, is the sole base of the NBA charges against him - is against California law and that Sterling never violated the NBA's constitution.
The lawsuit also states that "the forced sale of the Los Angeles Clippers threatens not only to produce a lower price than a non-forced sale, but more importantly, it injures competition and forces antitrust injury by making the ... market unresponsive to ... the operation of the free market."
What was going on inside the mind of Elliot Rodger, the young man who killed six people, Santa Barbara, California?
One survivor of the rampage who was shot five times outside her sorority house tells ABC News she will never forget Rodger's smirk - just before he opened fire, killing two of her friends.
"I see his face, he smiles at me and then he starts shooting," she said. "He was just he wanted to do this, he looked happy about it."
The Santa Barbara County Sheriff's Department is facing questions about whether they missed an opportunity to stop the rampage.
Police were aware of Rodger's disturbing videos when they spoke to him last month during a welfare check.
But as Sara Sidner reports, they never watched the videos.View my Flipboard Magazine.
(CNN) - Some residents of Oakland, California, fear their community is creating a monster.
The city calls it the Domain Awareness Center, but opponents call it a "spy machine" and a potential "tool of injustice."
Known as "the DAC," it's a proposed central surveillance facility where authorities can monitor the Port of Oakland and the city's airport to protect against potential terrorism.
But the broader issue of centralized data surveillance poses serious privacy questions for millions of people in cities around the globe.
In March, more than 100 worried Oakland residents waited past midnight to complain about it during a City Council meeting. Standing at the mic, Maya Shweiky, a self-described public school teacher and Muslim, warned lawmakers their proposal would be used to "discriminate against minorities and perpetuate racial, religious and political profiling."
While the council voted on the proposal, rowdy protesters began chanting, "No! No! No! No!"
Council members have proposed expanding the DAC to add live, 24/7 data streams from closed circuit traffic cameras, police license plate readers, gunshot detectors and other sources from all over the entire city of Oakland.